Subscribe
Click here to subscribe to Best Best & Krieger's Legal AlertsFind Out More
Best Best & Krieger Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Practice Page
-
Prior Posts
- Time for a Defined Contribution Plan Checkup?
- The Battle Over “Vested Rights” In California
- They’re Yours, They’re Mine or They’re on Their Own: More On Employee vs. Independent Contractor
- Yours, Mine, Ours: Are the Individuals Working for You Your Employees?
- How Is Liability-driven Investing Different?
Archives
Categories
- 401(a) (2)
- 457(b) Plans (2)
- Administrative Committee (2)
- Beneficiary Designation (1)
- Collective Bargaining (1)
- Employer's Government Status (2)
- ERISA (1)
- fiduciary (3)
- Authority (1)
- Investments (2)
- Governmental plans (12)
- Governmental Retirement (18)
- Pre-Approved (3)
- Health Coverage (5)
- Income Taxation of Employees (2)
- individually designed plan (1)
- IRS plan review (1)
- Missing Participants (1)
- NAGDCA (1)
- Pension (15)
- Pension Reform (3)
- PEPRA (3)
- Pick-Up Plan (1)
- Plan Administration (4)
- Plan Administrator (1)
- Plan Fees (2)
- Plan Qualification (3)
- PTO (2)
- record-keeping (1)
- Retiree Health (20)
- Retirement Plan Fees (1)
- Retirement Plans (4)
- RMDs (1)
- Rural Cooperatives (1)
- Severance pay benefits (1)
- Social Security Administration (1)
- Tussey (1)
- Uncategorized (2)
- Windsor (1)
Tag Archives: PEMHCA
Chapter 12: When Treating Everyone The Same May Not Work – Working With PEMHCA’s Equal Contribution Rule
By: Jeff Chang Sometimes the realities of family budgets – budgets in general – collide with notions of fairness and equal treatment. I can still remember the deep disappointment in the eyes of our youngest child many years ago when we … Continue reading
Tagged CalPERS, cost savings, equal contribution rule, PEMHCA, retiree health insurance
Comments Off on Chapter 12: When Treating Everyone The Same May Not Work – Working With PEMHCA’s Equal Contribution Rule