Subscribe
Click here to subscribe to Best Best & Krieger's Legal AlertsFind Out More
Best Best & Krieger Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Practice Page
-
Prior Posts
- Time for a Defined Contribution Plan Checkup?
- The Battle Over “Vested Rights” In California
- They’re Yours, They’re Mine or They’re on Their Own: More On Employee vs. Independent Contractor
- Yours, Mine, Ours: Are the Individuals Working for You Your Employees?
- How Is Liability-driven Investing Different?
Archives
Categories
- 401(a) (2)
- 457(b) Plans (2)
- Administrative Committee (2)
- Beneficiary Designation (1)
- Collective Bargaining (1)
- Employer's Government Status (2)
- ERISA (1)
- fiduciary (3)
- Authority (1)
- Investments (2)
- Governmental plans (12)
- Governmental Retirement (18)
- Pre-Approved (3)
- Health Coverage (5)
- Income Taxation of Employees (2)
- individually designed plan (1)
- IRS plan review (1)
- Missing Participants (1)
- NAGDCA (1)
- Pension (15)
- Pension Reform (3)
- PEPRA (3)
- Pick-Up Plan (1)
- Plan Administration (4)
- Plan Administrator (1)
- Plan Fees (2)
- Plan Qualification (3)
- PTO (2)
- record-keeping (1)
- Retiree Health (20)
- Retirement Plan Fees (1)
- Retirement Plans (4)
- RMDs (1)
- Rural Cooperatives (1)
- Severance pay benefits (1)
- Social Security Administration (1)
- Tussey (1)
- Uncategorized (2)
- Windsor (1)
Tag Archives: Fiduciary Duty Government Pension
Why Hire A “3(38)” Adviser For A Public Agency 457(b) Or 401(a) Plan?
By Jeff Chang Most public sector retirement plan sponsors understand that even though their plans may not be subject to the fiduciary duties and responsibilities of ERISA, they are still subject to fiduciary duties under applicable State law. Moreover, certain … Continue reading
Tagged Fiduciary Duty Government Pension, Government Pensions, governmental retirement plan
Comments Off on Why Hire A “3(38)” Adviser For A Public Agency 457(b) Or 401(a) Plan?
Chapter 16: Same-Gender Spouse Ruling Requires Review Of Public Retirement Plans
By: Jeff Chang On June 26, 2013, in United States v. Windsor (Windsor), the Supreme Court decided that section 3 of the Defense Of Marriage Act (DOMA) was unconstitutional. DOMA had limited “marriage” to opposite-gender couples for purposes of federal law. … Continue reading
Tagged california retirement, DOMA, Domestic partner, Fiduciary Duty Government Pension, governmental retirement plan, Windsor
Comments Off on Chapter 16: Same-Gender Spouse Ruling Requires Review Of Public Retirement Plans
Chapter 4: A Lesson From The “Show Me” State
By: Jeff Chang Although governmental plans are not subject to ERISA, all are subject to a combination of State and common law fiduciary rules – many of which (including California’s) contain language identical to the standards of ERISA. Most fiduciaries of … Continue reading
Tagged Fiduciary Duty Government Pension, governmental retirement plan
Comments Off on Chapter 4: A Lesson From The “Show Me” State