Subscribe
Click here to subscribe to Best Best & Krieger's Legal Alerts and be sure to select "Employee Benefits - Public Agency" list to receive Focus on Public Benefits blog postsFind Out More
Best Best & Krieger Public Sector: Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Practice Page
-
Prior Posts
- Have You Been Told Lately That You Owe ESRP?
- Lessons From the Private Sector: Takeaways From Recent ERISA Plan Fiduciary and Fee Litigation
- Recognizing That All “Rates of Return” Are Not the Same
- If You Don’t Have a Section 218 Agreement, Watch Out for the Social Security “Gotcha”
- “Encouraging” the Repayment of Student Loan Debt
Archives
Categories
- 401(a) (3)
- 457(b) Plans (2)
- Administrative Committee (2)
- Beneficiary Designation (1)
- Collective Bargaining (1)
- Employer's Government Status (2)
- ERISA (2)
- fiduciary (5)
- Authority (1)
- Investments (3)
- Governmental plans (14)
- Governmental Retirement (19)
- Pre-Approved (3)
- Health Coverage (6)
- Income Taxation of Employees (2)
- individually designed plan (1)
- IRS plan review (1)
- Missing Participants (1)
- NAGDCA (1)
- Pension (15)
- Pension Reform (3)
- PEPRA (3)
- Pick-Up Plan (1)
- Plan Administration (5)
- Plan Administrator (1)
- Plan Fees (2)
- Plan Qualification (4)
- PTO (2)
- record-keeping (1)
- Retiree Health (20)
- Retirement Plan Fees (1)
- Retirement Plans (7)
- RMDs (1)
- Rural Cooperatives (1)
- Severance pay benefits (1)
- Social Security Administration (2)
- Tussey (1)
- Uncategorized (3)
- Windsor (1)
Tag Archives: DOMA
Chapter 16: Same-Gender Spouse Ruling Requires Review Of Public Retirement Plans
By: Jeff Chang On June 26, 2013, in United States v. Windsor (Windsor), the Supreme Court decided that section 3 of the Defense Of Marriage Act (DOMA) was unconstitutional. DOMA had limited “marriage” to opposite-gender couples for purposes of federal law. … Continue reading
Tagged california retirement, DOMA, Domestic partner, Fiduciary Duty Government Pension, governmental retirement plan, Windsor
Comments Off on Chapter 16: Same-Gender Spouse Ruling Requires Review Of Public Retirement Plans