Subscribe
Click here to subscribe to Best Best & Krieger's Legal AlertsFind Out More
Best Best & Krieger Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Practice Page
BBKnowledge: Sharing our knowledge of emerging issues in public agency law
-
Prior Posts
- They’re Yours, They’re Mine or They’re on Their Own: More On Employee vs. Independent Contractor
- Yours, Mine, Ours: Are the Individuals Working for You Your Employees?
- How Is Liability-driven Investing Different?
- Avoid Big Surprises After You Retire – Like a Major Reduction of Your Social Security
- When It Comes to Funding Pension and/or OPEB Liabilities, Not All Section 115 Trusts are Created Equal
Archives
Categories
- 401(a) (2)
- 457(b) Plans (2)
- Administrative Committee (2)
- Beneficiary Designation (1)
- Collective Bargaining (1)
- Employer's Government Status (2)
- ERISA (1)
- fiduciary (3)
- Authority (1)
- Investments (2)
- Governmental plans (12)
- Governmental Retirement (18)
- Pre-Approved (3)
- Health Coverage (5)
- Income Taxation of Employees (2)
- individually designed plan (1)
- IRS plan review (1)
- Missing Participants (1)
- NAGDCA (1)
- Pension (15)
- Pension Reform (2)
- PEPRA (2)
- Pick-Up Plan (1)
- Plan Administration (3)
- Plan Administrator (1)
- Plan Fees (2)
- Plan Qualification (3)
- PTO (2)
- record-keeping (1)
- Retiree Health (20)
- Retirement Plan Fees (1)
- Retirement Plans (3)
- RMDs (1)
- Rural Cooperatives (1)
- Severance pay benefits (1)
- Social Security Administration (1)
- Tussey (1)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Windsor (1)
Tag Archives: DOMA
Chapter 16: Same-Gender Spouse Ruling Requires Review Of Public Retirement Plans
On June 26, 2013, in United States v. Windsor (Windsor), the Supreme Court decided that section 3 of the Defense Of Marriage Act (DOMA) was unconstitutional. DOMA had limited “marriage” to opposite-gender couples for purposes of federal law. As result … Continue reading
Tagged california retirement, DOMA, Domestic partner, Fiduciary Duty Government Pension, governmental retirement plan, Windsor
Comments Off on Chapter 16: Same-Gender Spouse Ruling Requires Review Of Public Retirement Plans