Search
Subscribe
Subscribe to receive emails regarding our latest blog posts.
Past Blog Posts
Categories
-
Popular Posts
- Using a Section 115 Trust to Help Manage Pension Obligations 2.2k views | posted on September 13, 2017
- Public Agency Board Members’ Worker Classification Matters for Tax Purposes 1.3k views | posted on July 22, 2019
- If You Don’t Have a Section 218 Agreement, Watch Out for the Social Security “Gotcha” 1.2k views | posted on October 19, 2018
- Chapter 13: Some Things Are Worth Repeating – Beware of PTO Cash-Outs! 1k views | posted on April 22, 2014
- Using 457(b) Unforeseeable Emergency Distributions During the Coronavirus Crisis 1k views | posted on March 24, 2020
- Chapter 28: Why Cashing Out PTO Next Year Doesn’t Work 1k views | posted on August 15, 2016
- The CARES Act’s New Rules for Coronavirus-related Distributions from Governmental 457(b) Plans 893 views | posted on April 2, 2020
- Take Care When Cost-Sharing Under CalPERS 853 views | posted on November 7, 2019
- Why You Need to “Monitor” Full-time, Temporary Employees 852 views | posted on August 30, 2018
- COVID-19 Pandemic May Force Some Cities to Reset Employee Benefits 837 views | posted on May 11, 2020
Tag Archives: co-providers
Problems with Co-Provider 457(b) Plan Arrangements
By Jeff Chang There is a novel recordkeeping and plan investment arrangement for governmental 457(b) plans that could create a number of problems for the plan’s sponsor, fiduciaries and participants. There may be a significant number of these arrangements throughout … Continue reading
Posted in 457(b) Plans, Administrative Committee, Plan Administration, record-keeping, Retirement Plan Fees
Tagged co-providers, multiple employer 457(b)
Comments Off on Problems with Co-Provider 457(b) Plan Arrangements