Subscribe
Click here to subscribe to Best Best & Krieger's Legal Alerts and be sure to select "Employee Benefits - Public Agency" list to receive Focus on Public Benefits blog postsFind Out More
Best Best & Krieger Public Sector: Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Practice Page
-
Prior Posts
- The CARES Act’s New Rules for Coronavirus-related Distributions from Governmental 457(b) Plans
- Using 457(b) Unforeseeable Emergency Distributions During the Coronavirus Crisis
- One-time Irrevocable Elections and 401(a) Opt-in Plans
- Making Sense of Your Retiree Health “Savings” Plan
- Taking Advantage of Governmental Retirement Plan Contribution Limits
Archives
Categories
- 401(a) (9)
- 457(b) Plans (7)
- Administrative Committee (2)
- Beneficiary Designation (1)
- Collective Bargaining (2)
- Employer's Government Status (3)
- ERISA (5)
- fiduciary (8)
- Authority (1)
- Investments (6)
- Governmental plans (24)
- Governmental Retirement (22)
- Pre-Approved (4)
- Health Coverage (6)
- Income Taxation of Employees (7)
- individually designed plan (1)
- IRS plan review (1)
- Missing Participants (1)
- NAGDCA (1)
- Pension (18)
- Pension Reform (4)
- PEPRA (4)
- Pick-Up Plan (3)
- Plan Administration (13)
- Plan Administrator (2)
- Plan Fees (3)
- Plan Qualification (8)
- PTO (2)
- record-keeping (4)
- Retiree Health (21)
- Retirement Plan Fees (1)
- Retirement Plans (9)
- RMDs (1)
- Rural Cooperatives (1)
- Severance pay benefits (1)
- Social Security Administration (4)
- Tussey (1)
- Uncategorized (3)
- Windsor (1)
Category Archives: Investments
Understanding the Fees Paid by Your Governmental Retirement Plan
By Jeff Chang There are several fundamental principles and concepts that governmental plan sponsors and fiduciaries need to bear in mind as they select and monitor their plan providers and the fees that these providers charge.
Tagged fees, stable value
Comments Off on Understanding the Fees Paid by Your Governmental Retirement Plan
Rules Governing Your Participant-Directed 457(b) or Defined Contribution 401(a) Plan
By Jeff Chang Many cities and special districts in California maintain one or more defined contribution retirement plans (i.e., a 457(b) or 401(a) plan) in which the participants are given investment responsibility over their respective accounts. However, many agencies are … Continue reading
Tagged 404(c), participant-directed
Comments Off on Rules Governing Your Participant-Directed 457(b) or Defined Contribution 401(a) Plan
When a Section 115 Pension Stabilization Trust is “Too Good To Be True”
By Jeff Chang To prepare for and manage significantly increased CalPERS employer contribution rates in the coming years, California public agencies approved the establishment and funding of so-called “pension rate stabilization trusts.” Clients have asked for evaluations of the various … Continue reading
Tagged 115 Trust, CalPERS rate increases, local agency funds, pension stabilization trust
Comments Off on When a Section 115 Pension Stabilization Trust is “Too Good To Be True”
Recognizing That All “Rates of Return” Are Not the Same
By Jeff Chang As a “baby-boomer” and one of the millions of my generation getting ready for retirement, I’ve naturally begun to focus more on the ups and downs of the stock market and all of the “advice” regarding how … Continue reading
Tagged liability-driven investments, rate of return, retirement investing, sequence of returns
Comments Off on Recognizing That All “Rates of Return” Are Not the Same
Why Hire A “3(38)” Adviser For A Public Agency 457(b) Or 401(a) Plan?
By Jeff Chang Most public sector retirement plan sponsors understand that even though their plans may not be subject to the fiduciary duties and responsibilities of ERISA, they are still subject to fiduciary duties under applicable State law. Moreover, certain … Continue reading
Tagged Fiduciary Duty Government Pension, Government Pensions, governmental retirement plan
Comments Off on Why Hire A “3(38)” Adviser For A Public Agency 457(b) Or 401(a) Plan?